Run UG, PG and scholarships from one account
Pick a template per intake type, configure the review stages, respect faculty-level capacity and reuse applicant records across cycles — without forking the platform.
What university admissions usually look like
The strain we hear from registrars and faculty admissions offices.
One monolithic form for everything
A single, monolithic application that no faculty owns and no applicant trusts — the same form for a master’s thesis and an undergraduate.
Workflow handoffs by email
Applications reviewed by admissions, then faculty, then finance — each handoff a fresh email thread with no shared status.
Applicant records re-entered every cycle
A returning applicant uploads the same documents and re-enters the same data with every new application.
Decisions reconstructed for review
Committees, governors and external reviewers ask for the rationale — answered by trawling through email.
How Admissions Africa works for universities
Built for parallel cycles, multi-stage review and faculty-level ownership.
Pick a process template per intake
Pre-built templates for undergraduate, postgraduate and scholarship intake — each with its own form, required documents and review stages.
Multi-stage review with conditional gates
A configurable workflow routes each application through registrar, faculty and finance, with progression gated on the rules you set.
Reusable applicant records across cycles
A single applicant can apply to multiple programmes and cycles without re-entering the same data — and decisions are linked to one canonical record.
Decisions logged with full audit trail
Every step, score and approval is logged for moderators, governors and external reviewers — no more reconstruction.
Features that matter most for higher ed
Tuned for the parallelism and ownership that universities and polytechnics actually need.
UG, PG and scholarship process templates
Pre-built process templates for undergraduate, postgraduate and scholarship intake — each ready to configure to your stages.
Multi-stage review workflows
Registrar, faculty, finance and review committees each see their stage and own their handoffs.
Multi-branch (faculty as branch)
Each faculty has its own capacity, access controls and reporting; central admissions still gets a unified view.
Reusable applicant records
A single applicant record across cycles, with documents and decisions reusable across programmes.
Faculty- and programme-owned processes
Each faculty or programme runs its own process — own form, required documents, review stages and reporting — without forking the platform.
Cohort waitlists with ranking
Programme caps respected at every stage; ranked waitlists promoted automatically with notifications.
Today vs with Admissions Africa
A representative slice of the operational shift.
Common questions from registrars and faculty offices
Ready to run every cycle from one account?
Currently in early access. Join the waitlist and shape the platform with us.
